Welcome, Guest

Author Topic: wild rose  (Read 1956 times)

Offline PeeVee

  • House Bee
  • **
  • Posts: 222
  • Gender: Male
wild rose
« on: June 21, 2009, 08:59:23 pm »
We have a lot of wild rose here. Multiflora rose that is. Rather invasive.

Just wondering if the bees are interested  or not.  They were flying today between the nearly constant rain showers but I haven't seen them on the rose blooms. They seem to be bringing in pollen steadily but I haven't determined where they are traveling to.

Cheers,
Paul
-Paul VanSlyke - Cheers from Deposit,NY

Online Kathyp

  • Global Moderator
  • Universal Bee
  • *******
  • Posts: 20449
  • Gender: Female
Re: wild rose
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2009, 09:10:19 pm »
they were all over mine.  i have many and they bloomed before the blackberries.
Someone really ought to tell them that the world of Ayn Rand?s novel was not meant to be aspirational.

Offline PeeVee

  • House Bee
  • **
  • Posts: 222
  • Gender: Male
Re: wild rose
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2009, 09:15:07 pm »
Ahhh,

I'll have to check for blackberry blossoms. They may have started as well. But there is a really large rose bush 20 feet away from the hive.

-Paul
-Paul VanSlyke - Cheers from Deposit,NY

Offline fermentedhiker

  • Field Bee
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
  • Gender: Male
Re: wild rose
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2009, 09:16:52 pm »
no nectar from roses.  They might be getting pollen though.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
--Douglas Adams

Online Kathyp

  • Global Moderator
  • Universal Bee
  • *******
  • Posts: 20449
  • Gender: Female
Re: wild rose
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2009, 10:32:23 pm »
yup.  tons on pollen.  wild roses are not the same as your domestic type.  they are kind of flat.  at least the roses here are.  smell great, but make me sneeze.
Someone really ought to tell them that the world of Ayn Rand?s novel was not meant to be aspirational.

Offline PeeVee

  • House Bee
  • **
  • Posts: 222
  • Gender: Male
Re: wild rose
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2009, 06:51:22 am »
Thanks,
I wasn't aware of the lack of nectar. :(  I guess because it was a flower I just thought there was nectar as well.

-Paul
-Paul VanSlyke - Cheers from Deposit,NY

Offline luvin honey

  • Super Bee
  • *****
  • Posts: 1540
  • Gender: Female
Re: wild rose
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2009, 09:56:20 am »
It would be nice to have some benefit from the roses, seeing as they are invading our woods and hedges and becoming a massively invasive species!
The pedigree of honey
Does not concern the bee;
A clover, any time, to him
Is aristocracy.
---Emily Dickinson

Offline bakerboy

  • New Bee
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Gender: Male
Re: wild rose
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2009, 10:33:04 am »
 Wild roses make nice wind breaks. Other than that I just obliterate them if they get in the way. The brush hog attachment on my tractor has no problems with them.

Online Kathyp

  • Global Moderator
  • Universal Bee
  • *******
  • Posts: 20449
  • Gender: Female
Re: wild rose
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2009, 11:06:02 am »
Quote
The brush hog attachment on my tractor has no problems with them

vegetation demolition.  one of my favorite things!!   :evil:
Someone really ought to tell them that the world of Ayn Rand?s novel was not meant to be aspirational.

 

anything