Not sure I would use any of these statements...misleading and not really true and the last thing we need is more misinformation about bees. If you ever do swarm captures how do you justify the wild bee statements....you have just shot yourself in the foot if you have these statements out there and then install a captured swarm even though we all know "wild bees" aren't necessarily untamed.
I don't know where your bees come from, but mine have been bred like livestock for almost 100 years. I requeen swarms with the same. I am in the process of switching to Ferguson Buckfast because I'm seeing some less than desirable testiness from the southern providers.
Here's a sample of the old advertising for Buckfast breeding:
During a two year test of six stocks of bees at the University of Minnesota, the Buckfast ranked:
Nosema in Queens - none
Acceptance - BEST (100%)
Spring Buildup - BEST
Gentleness - very gentle (second just behind Midnites)Swarming Tendency - very low (ranked second)
Propolizing - slight (All Buckfast colonies)
Longevity of Queens - TIED FOR BEST (87% after 16 months)
Wintering - TIED FOR BEST
and..
HONEY PRODUCTION - BEST (during two years). For details see the February, March, and April 1982 issues of American Bee Journal.
Housekeeping - Buckfast bees keep a clean, neat hive. This helps them to resist diseases of the brood.
Adaptation - These bees do well anywhere, but are especially well adapted to areas having damp, cold winters.
Compatibility - Buckfast Queens cross well with other breeds.
If that's not enough there's a pretty good synopsis here:
http://www.rweaver.com/adam.php Now if you're going to promote feral bees, well, yeah, yer foot's been shot