Hi All,
I would like some help deciding what to do about a weak nuc. Here's the scenario:
I picked up two nucs on April 29th. One from New Mexico and one local to Denver. The NM hive had about 3 frames of bees. The Denver hive had about 1-1/2 to 2 frames of bees. These are the first nucs I have ever bought and the first bees I have had in about 35 years. In other words, I am quite inexperienced with modern beekeeping.
A few days later, the Denver hive gets robbed and is substantially weakened before I stop the robbing and install a robber screen and reduce the entrance down to about 1/2". A few days after the robbing I inspect the Denver hive. I found a few hundred dead bees, about 1 frame of live bees and the queen still alive. After the robbing, the Denver hive has some but not much activity at its entrance. I am thinking that this hive is now so weakened that it may not build up enough to survive the winter. Plus, it is now a potential target for wax moths and SHB, despite the reduced entrance.
On May 5th I pick up two more nucs from Grand Junction. One hive is Italians and one hive is Carniolans. Both are strong nucs, with about 3-1/2 frames of bees for the Italians and over 4 frames for the Carnies. There is lots of activity in front of these hive each day, especially bees orienting each afternoon. Both of these hives have moved into the medium super I placed on each brood chamber and are building comb in the medium foundationless frames.
It seems I have two options regarding the weakened Denver hive:
1) Leave it alone and let Nature take its course.
2) Swap in a frame of brood and nurse bees from the Carnies or Italians (probably the Carnies since they are growing the fastest), and swap hive positions with the Carnies or Italians (probably the Italians just to spread the bee-donation load out between hives) in the middle of the day. My thought is that this would boost the brood numbers, boost the nurse bee population, and boost the field force. Such manipulations would hopefully strengthen the Denver nuc to get it back on track to survive the winter, with little negative affect on the donor hives.
My feelings are I hate to do #1 because I don't want to write off the $125 I just paid for the Denver nuc so soon after buying it. Also, since the hive was robbed, it never got a chance to show what it could do, and it may in fact be a perfectly good strain of bees that are worth saving. I suspect that the person who supplied me the nuc, threw it together just before I bought it, and I got little more than a package with queen instead of a nuc. Something that is not a fault of the bee's genetics. (However, since this hive was damaged by the robbing, I think it is too late for me to go back the seller for some sort of recourse).
I hesitate to do #2, though, because if the weakened Denver hive is doomed to perish even with a boost, I don't want to take, and therefor waste, resources from the other hives.
A few other notes: I am a hobbyist (obviously) and so saving the hive is more important to me than maximizing cost efficiencies. In other words, I am in this for the fun and learning, not to make money, and don't mind spending a little extra to save a worthwhile hive. These hives are in my backyard, so it is easy for me to put whatever work is necessary into saving the Denver hive. The 24hr mite drop on all of these hive is less than 2 or 3. We had a warm and dry winter this year, and the Spring so far has been no better, so I am thinking we are going to have reduced forage available for bees this season.
Is doing #1 a no-brainer; or, is doing #2 a no-brainer; or, am I in a gray area with no obvious answer, and I just have to roll the dice with either #1 or #2 and hope for the best? Do I have another option?
TIA.
--shinbone