Personally, if you don't get mated queens, i think you are setting yourself back a bit of time as I understand it. Of course if your producing your own queens you have much more control over stock selection etc...
Steve, right. If the queens are not mated the beekeeper would be set back some time. But now think about it, if a
reputablebreeder sold unmated queens, it in my mind would not make logical sense
because: If the queen has not mated after 23 days or so after her birth, she will not mate ever. This
isknown fact and I can't see why anyone would sell an unmated queen. So, thinking about it, Charlie is right, all reputable queen breeders sell mated queens.
About the selection of own's own stock for queen rearing. I still don't understand how beekeepers can get really guaranteed good laying queens.
I would love to hear someone give some better advice on this than I can provide, but this is the way that I understand it.
The queen governs the laying characteristics of the hive, the drone governs the temperament. That is basically it in a nutshell, maybe a little more intricate, but that is the general plan.
Now if one takes a queen cell, allows it to be reared in the mating colony and then she heads off for her mating flight, unless you were residing some long fair distance from ANY OTHER COLONIES of bees, I think it would be pretty hard to prevent the neighbouring drones not to mate with your queen. I still cannot understand how the home-raised queens can be ultimate. I don't believe it. Cheaper certainly, but the stock is not being kept pure.
Yes, if one uses their own queens, they can select the colonies' who have great laying performance and this may be carried on, but it is the drones from elsewhere that may change the temperament. I see no point to this, unless it is a non-issue, with regard to whom impregnates the queen.
Just my two cents. Input from forum gurus would be great. Great day. Cindi