The study you refer to was done with 13 other scientists, did not say get rid of vaccines, it merely suggested that they needed further study, which is essentially what the thread about this documentary is about, not Andrew Wakefield.
Your second link, shows as a proof of the veracity of their conclusions, B. Deer, who just happens to be a third rate reporter who works for Rupert Murdoch, a British newspaper mogul whose son is on the board as a non-executive member to protect the company's reputation to the media, of Glaxo Smith Kline the vaccine manufacturer, a company that the Chinese have apparently gotten rid of and refused to do business with, because of bribery and corruption of officials in their country.
As far as what happened with his license he explains in the interviews I have linked. The other authors of the study also lost their licenses, but quite easily got their license back as it was a simple reapplication. Wakefield was harassed so much by B. Deer the man who had a huge financial reason to be an attack dog, that he decided to move to the US, where he is practicing now.
AW having a vaccine is news to me. He is a gastroenterologist. The parents of the autistic children approached him because their children had huge gastrointestinal issues. That is/was his area of expertise/research. His conclusion as well as the rest of the team was that the three vaccines when combined seem to be the problem. Basically from what I gather, the problem is that the human immune system has never had to deal with three infections simultaneously injected under the skin which bypasses all of the normal immune system. These three infections hitting simultaneously confuses or causes a reaction of some variety. His thoughts were to separate out the vaccines and administer them singly, which was a problem for the British government because it had just ordered a massive amount of the combined vaccines. He and his team basically said there was more research need as the vaccines got basically very little research before being accepted. He is not anti vaccine. His children were vaccinated.
His research was simply a case study of these victims and it is not true as you asserted that these children had problems before. You can even read it here: http://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(97)11096-0/abstract
It has retracted written across it but is readable.
If someone has enough money they can villify "Snow White". Donald Trump was easily vilified because the PPL who are worried about his intentions, own all of the media in the country/world.
Your fourth link quotes Brian Deer who I previously discredited. He in essence is the equivalent of the "baby of aliens" type of story.
Your fourth link "The Scientific Parent" is just someone shooting the breeze, providing no proof or studies and just wildly say exaggerated baseless statements.
The last link is a site which is paid for by the medical community that basically makes a living off of vaccines. Notice that they start off saying that " The American Academy of Pediatrics, the CDC, the World Health Organization, and the Institute of Medicine all agree that there's probably
no relationship between autism and vaccines." That is the whole point of the documentary. There is doubt and it should be studied rather than sticking the head in the sand.https://soundcloud.com/user-507883655/4-andrew-wakefield-interview-how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/10/wakefield-interview.aspxhttp://www.ageofautism.com/dr-andrew-wakefield/https://mediamatters.org/video/2016/04/21/fox-provides-platform-discredited-doctor-claim-cdc-hiding-evidence-vaccines-cause-autism/210015
There is lots of interviews of AW out there if you want to look.